Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal
Volume 23, Issue 1 , Pages 36-39, 2005

A Comparison of Analogue and Digital Video for Analysing the Temporal Phases of the Gait Cycle

  • James C. Wall, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Therapy, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA,
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests and correspondence to: Dr. James C. Wall, Department of Physical Therapy, University of South Alabama, Room 1214, 1504 Springhill Avenue, Mobile, AL 36604-37, USA
    • ,
  • Saud Al-Obaidi, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Therapy, Kuwait University, Kuwait

Received 26 February 2005; accepted 5 October 2005.

Article Outline

Abstract 

The duration of the temporal phases of the gait cycle can be determined from a slow motion video by timing the intervals between each make and break of foot-floor contact using a multi-memory stopwatch. This technique has been shown to be valid and reliable when using an analogue VHS video. The new MiniDV digital video format has excellent image quality, but runs in slow motion at about twice the speed of the analogue system. This study compared these formats with one another for measuring temporal phases of the gait cycle. Twenty-one healthy young adults were included, and each subject walked a distance of 7 m at self-selected slow, medium and fast walking speeds. A digital camcorder was used to videotape the subjects. A copy of this recording was placed on an analogue VHS system. Each recording was played in slow motion and the temporal phases were measured using the stopwatch. This process was repeated 1 month later by the same investigator. Reliability and validity were tested through analysis of mean differences and 95% CI. Both the systems showed high intra-rater reliability. Mean difference between the two systems was 1.429% stride time for double support phases and −1.410% stride time for single support/swing phases.

Key words:  gait , temporal phases , measurement , video

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

 

Back to Article Outline

References 

  1. Wall JC , Charteris J , Turnbull GI . Two steps equals one stride equals what? The applicability of normal gait nomenclature to abnormal walking patterns . Clin Biomech . 1987;2:119–125
  2. Wall JC , Turnbull GI . Gait asymmetries in residual hemiplegia . Arch Phys Med Rehabil . 1986;67:550–553
  3. Wall JC , Hogan DB , Turnbull GI , et al.   The kinematics of idiopathic gait disorder. A comparison with healthy young and elderly females . Scand J Rehabil Med . 1991;23:159–164
  4. Walsh JP . Foot fall measurement technology . In:  Craik RL ,  Oatis CA editor. Gait Analysis Theory and Application . St. Louis: Mosby; 1995;p. 125–142
  5. Bilney B , Morris M , Webster K . Concurrent related validity of the GAITRite walkway system for quantification of the spatial and temporal parameters of gait . Gait Posture . 2003;17:68–74
  6. Nelson AJ , Zwick D , Brody S , et al.   The validity of the GAITRite and the Functional Ambulation Performance scoring system in the analysis of Parkinson gait . NeuroRehabilitation . 2002;17:255–262
  7. Wall JC , Scarbrough J . Use of a multimemory stopwatch to measure the temporal gait parameters . J Orthop Sports Phys Ther . 1997;25:277–281
  8. Available from: http://www.fetchfido.co.uk/games/reaction/reaction_test.htm.

 This paper was adapted from a presentation made at the 14th International Congress of the World Confederation for Physical Therapy, Barcelona, June 2003. This study was undertaken while one of the authors (JCW) was a visiting Professor at Kuwait University.

PII: S1013-7025(09)70057-0

doi:10.1016/S1013-7025(09)70057-0

Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal
Volume 23, Issue 1 , Pages 36-39, 2005

Article Tools