Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal
Volume 23, Issue 1 , Pages 6-12, 2005

Reference Values for 6-Minute Walk Test and Hand-Grip Strength in Healthy Hong Kong Chinese Adults

  • Raymond C.C. Tsang, MSc(PT), MMed Sc(Med Stat)

      Affiliations

    • On behalf of the Physiotherapy Working Group on SARS, Coordinating Committee in Physiotherapy, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong SAR, China.
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests and correspondence to: Raymond Tsang, Physiotherapy Department, Queen Mary Hospital, 102 Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong

Received 23 August 2004; accepted 28 January 2005.

Article Outline

Abstract 

This study aimed to establish reference values for the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and hand-grip strength (HGS) in healthy Hong Kong Chinese adults and to examine their test-retest reliability. There were 548 subjects in five age strata between 21 and 70 years old. The 6MWT was administered and isometric HGS was measured following standard protocols on two occasions separated by 3 days. The 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) was measured once on each day. HGS was measured three successive times for both the dominant and non-dominant hands on each occasion. Both the mean values (mean method) and the maximum values (maximum method) of the three successive measurements were recorded for data analysis. Test-retest reliability was calculated in terms of intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), minimum detectable change (MDC) and 95% limits of agreement (LoA). In the first test, mean ± standard deviation (SD) of 6MWD for males and females were 635 ± 97 m and 573 ± 91 m, respectively; mean ± SD HGS (mean values) for dominant and non-dominant hands were 43.8 ± 8.0 kgf and 40.8 ± 7.8 kgf for males, and 28.5 ± 5.7 kgf and 26.2 ± 5.5 kgf for females, respectively, while mean ± SD HGS (maximum values) were 45.5 ± 8.1 kgf and 42.6 ± 8.1 kgf for males, and 29.8 ± 5.8 kgf and 27.6 ± 5.6 kgf for females, respectively. There was a mean increase of 10.8 ± 50.0 m in 6MWD in the second test. The test-retest reliabilities of 6MWD were satisfactory (ICC[2,1], 0.87; 95% confidence interval, CI, 0.84–0.89; SEM, 35.3 m; MDC, 97.8 m; 95% LoA, −87.9 to 108.6 m). The lower limit of the 95% CI for the ICC of HGS measurements was 0.94. The SEM and MDC for HGS measurements ranged from 2.0–2.2 kgf and from 5.5–6.2 kgf, respectively. The 95% LoA ranged from −6.7–5.6 kgf. This study established a set of reference values for the 6MWT and HGS in a group of healthy Hong Kong Chinese subjects. Although the test-retest reliabilities in terms of ICC for 6MWT and HGS measurement were satisfactory to high, the associated random variations were large on repeated measurements. Physiotherapists should be aware of these random errors in the evaluation of change in 6MWT and HGS. In the future, the normative values for 6MWT and HGS in Hong Kong Chinese adults should be established with random sampling of subjects from the community.

Key words:  walk test , 6-minute walk test , hand-grip strength

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

 

Back to Article Outline

References 

  1. Solway S , Brooks D , Lacasse Y , et al.   A qualitative systematic overview of the measurement properties of functional walk tests used in the cardiorespiratory domain . Chest . 2001;119:256–270
  2. Finch E , Brooks D , Stratford PW , et al.   In: Physical Rehabilitation Outcome Measures: A Guide to Enhanced Clinical Decision Making . 2 edition. Hamilton, Ontario: BC Decker; 2002;p. 248–253
  3. Enright PL , Sherrill DL . Reference equations for the 6-minute walk in healthy adults . Am J Respir Crit Care Med . 1998;158:1384–1387
  4. Gibbons W , Fruchter N , Sloan S , et al.   Reference values for a multiple repetition 6-minute walk test in healthy adults older than 20 years . J Cardiopulm Rehabil . 2001;21:87–93
  5. Rantanen T , Guralnik JM , Foley D , et al.   Midlife hand grip strength as a predictor of old age disability . JAMA . 1999;281:558–560
  6. Rantanen T , Volpato S , Ferrucci L , et al.   Handgrip strength and cause-specific and total mortality in older disabled women: exploring the mechanism . J Am Geriatr Soc . 2003;51:636–641
  7. ATS statement  . Guidelines for the 6-minute walk test . Am J Respir Crit Care Med . 2002;166:111–117
  8. Fess EE . Grip strength . In:  Casanova JS editors. Clinical Assessment Recommendations . 2 edition. Chicago: American Society of Hand Therapists; 1992;p. 41–45
  9. Chow SC , Shao J , Wang H . In: Sample Size Calculations in Clinical Research . New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.; 2003;p. 15
  10. Borg GAV . Psycho-physical bases of perceived exertion . Med Sci Sports Exerc . 1982;14:377–381
  11. Portney LG , Watkins MP . In: Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice . 2 edition. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 2000;p. 562–567
  12. Schuck P . Assessing reproducibility for interval data in health-related quality of life questionnaires: which coefficient should be used . Qual Life Res . 2004;13:571–586
  13. Bland JM , Altman DG . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement . Lancet . 1986;i:307–310
  14. Atkinson G , Nevill AM . Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine . Sports Med . 1998;26:217–238
  15. Hanten WP , Chen WY , Austin AA , et al.   Maximum grip strength in normal subjects from 20 to 64 years of age . J Hand Ther . 1999;12:193–200
  16. Desrosiers J , Bravo G , Hebert R , et al.   Normative data for grip strength of elderly men and women . Am J Occup Ther . 1995;49:637–644
  17. MacDermid JC , Alyafi T , Richards RS , et al.   Test-retest reliability of isometric strength and endurance grip tests performed on the Jamar and NK devices . Physiother Can . 2001;53:48–59
  18. Schreuders TAR , Roebroeck ME , Goumans J , et al.   Measurement error in grip and pinch force measurements in patients with hand injuries . Phys Ther . 2003;83:806–815
  19. Nitschke JE , McMeeken JM , Burry HC , et al.   When is a change a genuine change? A clinically meaningful interpretation of grip strength measurements in healthy and disabled women . J Hand Ther . 1999;12:25–30
  20. Haidar SG , Kumar D , Bassi RS , et al.   Average versus maximum grip strength: which is more consistent? . J Hand Surg . 2004;29-B:82–84

PII: S1013-7025(09)70053-3

doi:10.1016/S1013-7025(09)70053-3

Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal
Volume 23, Issue 1 , Pages 6-12, 2005

Article Tools