Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal
Volume 22, Issue 1 , Pages 22-28, 2004

Applicability of Goal Attainment Scaling in the Evaluation of Gross Motor Changes in Children with Cerebral Palsy

  • Louisa S.H. Law, EdD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China
  • ,
  • Mandy Oi-Sheung Dai, MSc

      Affiliations

    • The Spastics Association of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
  • ,
  • Andrew Siu, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests and correspondence to: Dr. Andrew Siu, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong SAR, China

Received 12 February 2004; accepted 28 August 2004.

Article Outline

Abstract 

The purpose of the study was to investigate the applicability of goal attainment scaling (GAS) in children with cerebral palsy (CP) by examining the psychometric properties of GAS. Three areas of psychometric properties were studied, namely: responsiveness, reliability and content validity. Three gross motor functional goals in the format of GAS and behavioural objectives were developed for 25 children with CP, but one child was excluded because of poor attendance. The content validity of the goals in the GAS format was first reviewed by a panel of experts. All children then received 4 months of conductive education as the intervention in a special child care centre. After the intervention, GAS scores as well as T-scores were compared with the achievement of behavioural objectives for responsiveness, and the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of GAS were tested. GAS had good content validity (based on the descriptive analysis) and reliability (based on intraclass correlation coefficient) and was more responsive than the corresponding behavioural objectives. Thus, GAS was more useful than behavioural objectives in monitoring the longitudinal progress of a child and in providing precise information on the effectiveness of interventions to therapists and administrators. In conclusion, GAS is applicable in children with CP but limitations to its applicability are discussed.

Key words:  applicability , goal attainment scaling , cerebral palsy

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

 

Back to Article Outline

References 

  1. Dabney KW , Lipton GE , Miller F . Cerebral palsy . Curr Opin Pediatr . 1997;9:81–88
  2. Holden RH . A review of psychological studies in cerebral palsy . Am J Ment Defic . 1952;57:92–98
  3. Ottenbacher KJ , Cusick A . Discriminative versus evaluative assessment: some observations on goal attainment scaling . Am J Occup Ther . 1993;47:349–354
  4. Grenville J , Lyne P . Patient-centred evaluation and rehabilitative care . J Adv Nurs . 1995;22:965–972
  5. Rockwood K , Stolee P , Howard K , et al.   Use of goal attainment scaling to measure treatment effects in an anti-dementia drug trial . Neuroepidemiology . 1996;15:330–338
  6. Bower E , McLellan DL . Evaluating therapy in cerebral palsy . Child Care Health Dev . 1994;20:409–419
  7. Forbes DA . Goal attainment scaling: a responsive measure of client outcomes . J Gerontol Nurs . 1998;12:34–40
  8. Maloney FP , Mirrett P , Brooks C , et al.   Use of goal attainment scaling in the treatment and ongoing evaluation of neurologi-cally handicapped children . Am J Occup Ther . 1978;32:505–510
  9. Palisano RJ , Haley SM , Brown DA . Goal attainment scaling as a measure of change in infants with motor delays . Phys Ther . 1992;72:432–437
  10. Brown DA , Effgens SK , Palisano RJ . Performance following ability-focused physical therapy intervention in individuals with severely limited physical and cognitive abilities . Phys Ther . 1998;78:934–950
  11. Au LF. Study of the feasibility of using goal attainment scaling in children with severe motor, sensory and cognitive impairments to measure outcomes of physiotherapy treatments. Hong Kong Polytechnic University, 2000. [Dissertation]
  12. Kirshner B , Guyatt GH . A methodologic framework for assessing health indices . J Chronic Dis . 1985;38:27–36
  13. Lynn MR . Determination and quantification of content validity . Nurs Res . 1986;35:382–385
  14. Kiresuk TJ , Sherman RE . Goal attainment scaling: a general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programmes . Community Ment Health J . 1968;4:443–453
  15. Waltz CF , Bausell RB . In: Nursing Research: Design, Statistics and Computer Analysis . Philadelphia: FA Davis Co.; 1981;p. 70–71
  16. King G , Tucker MA , Alambets P , et al.   The evaluation of functional school-based therapy services for children with special needs: a feasibility study . Phys Occup Ther Pediatr . 1998;19:5–30
  17. King GA , McDougall J , Palisano RJ , et al.   Goal attainment scaling: its use in evaluating pediatric therapy programs . Phys Occup Ther Pediatr . 1999;19:31–52

PII: S1013-7025(09)70046-6

doi:10.1016/S1013-7025(09)70046-6

Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal
Volume 22, Issue 1 , Pages 22-28, 2004