Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal
Volume 26, Issue 1 , Pages 39-44 , 2008

How Accurate are Therapeutic Ultrasound Machines?

  • Siobhan Schabrun, B Physio (Hons)

      Affiliations

    • School of Molecular and Biomedical Science (Physiology), University of Adelaide
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests and correspondence to: Siobhan Schabrun, School of Molecular and Biomedical Science (Physiology), University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
    • ,
  • Hayley Walker, B Physio (Hons)

      Affiliations

    • School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia (City East), Adelaide
    • ,
  • Lucy Chipchase, PhD

      Affiliations

    • School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Received 6 August 2008 ,Accepted 25 November 2008.

References 

  1. Robertson V , Ward A , Low J , et al.   Electrotherapy Explained: Principles and Practice . 4th edition. Sydney: Butterworth-Heinemann Elsevier; 2006;
  2. Goh AC , Chok B , Wong WP , et al.   Therapeutic ultrasound: rate of usage, knowledge of use, and opinions on dosimetry . Physiother Singapore . 1999;2:69–83
  3. Lindsay D , Dearness J , Richardson C , et al.   A survey of electromodality usage in private physiotherapy practices . Aust J Physiother . 1990;36:249–256
  4. Lindsay DM , Dearness J , McGinley CC . Electrotherapy usage trends in private physiotherapy practice in Alberta . Physiother Can . 1995;47:30–34
  5. Robertson VJ , Spurritt D . Electrophysical agents: implications of their availability and use in undergraduate clinical placements . Physiotherapy . 1998;84:335–344
  6. Chipchase LS , Trinkle D . Therapeutic ultrasound: clinician usage and perception of efficacy . Hong Kong Physiother J . 2003;21:5–13
  7. Pye S , Milford C . The performance of ultrasound physiotherapy machines in Lothian Region, Scotland, 1992 . Ultrasound Med Biol . 1994;20:347–359
  8. Artho PA , Thyne JG , Warring BP , et al.   A calibration study of therapeutic ultrasound units . Phys Ther . 2002;82:257–263
  9. Pye S . Ultrasound therapy equipment—does it perform? . Physiotherapy . 1996;82:39–44
  10. Rivest M , Quirion-de Girardi C , Seaborne D , et al.   Evaluation of therapeutic ultrasound devices: performance stability over 44 weeks of clinical use . Physiother Can . 1987;39:77–86
  11. International Electrotechnical Committee  . Ultrasonicsphysiotherapy Systems: Performance Requirements and Methods of Measurements in the Frequency Range 0.5 to 5 MHz . Geneva, Switzerland: International Electrotechnical Committee; 1996;
  12. Australian and New Zealand Standards  . Ultrasonics-physiotherapy Systems: Performance Requirements and Methods of Measurements in the Frequency Range 0.5 to 5 MHz (AS/NZS 4713) . Sydney: Standards Australia and Standards New Zealand; 2002;
  13. Australian and New Zealand Standards  . Guide to Testing and Calibration of Ultrasound Therapy Machines (AS/NZS Draft) . Sydney: Standards Australia and Standards New Zealand; 2005;
  14. Kollmann C , Vacariu G , Schuhfried O , et al.   Variations in the output power and surface heating effects of transducers in therapeutic ultrasound . Arch Phys Med Rehabil . 2005;86:1318–1324
  15. Pye S , Zeqiri B . Guidelines for Testing and Calibration of Physiotherapy Machines: Report No. 84 . England: Institution of Physics and Engineering in Medicine; 2001;
  16. Stewart HF , Harris GR , Herman BA , et al.   Survey of use and performance of ultrasonic therapy equipment in Pinellas County, Florida . Phys Ther . 1974;54:707–715
  17. Allen KG , Battye CK . Performance of ultrasonic therapy instruments . Physiotherapy . 1978;64:174–179
  18. Snow CJ . Ultrasound therapy units in Manitoba and Northwestern Ontario: performance evaluation . Physiother Can . 1982;34:185–189
  19. Lloyd JJ , Evans JA . A calibration survey of physiotherapy ultrasound equipment in North Wales . Physiotherapy . 1988;74:56–61
  20. Robertson V , Chipchase LS , Laakso EL , et al.   Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Electrophysical Agents . Australia: Australia Australian Physiotherapy Association; 2001;
  21. Bio-Tek Instruments Inc.  . Digital Ultrasound Wattmeter Model UW-II: Operators Manual . Winooski, VT: Bio-Tek Instruments Inc.; 1989;
  22. Beissner K . Primary measurement of ultrasonic power and dissemination of ultrasonic power reference values by means of standard transducers . Metrologia . 1999;36:313–320
  23. Sutton Y , Shaw A , Zeqiri B . Measurement of ultrasonic power using an acoustically absorbing well . Ultrasound Med Biol . 2003;29:1507–1513
  24. In:  Kitchen S editors. Electrotherapy: Evidence Based Practice . 11th edition. Oxford: Harcourt Publishers Ltd.; 2002;
  25. Ross RN , Sourkes AM , Sandeman JM . Survey of ultrasound therapy devices in Manitoba . Health Phys . 1984;47:595–601
  26. Chapman RH . A survey of output calibrations of ultrasound therapy equipment used in physiotherapy practice . NZ J Physiother . 1986;14:13–14
  27. Hekkenberg RT , Oosterbaan WA , van Beekum WT . Evaluation of ultrasound therapy devices . Physiotherapy . 1986;72:390–395
  28. Guirro R , Britshcy Dos Santos SC . Evaluation of the acoustic intensity of new ultrasound therapy equipment . Ultrasonics . 2002;39:553–557
  29. Robertson VJ . Dosage and treatment response in randomized clinical trials of therapeutic ultrasound . Phys Ther Sport . 2002;3:124–133
  30. Robertson VJ , Baker KG . A review of therapeutic ultrasound: effectiveness studies . Phys Ther . 2001;81:1339–1350
  31. Cunningham SJ . Calibration chaos makes research irrelevant . Physiotherapy . 1997;83:440–441

PII: S1013-7025(09)70006-5

doi: 10.1016/S1013-7025(09)70006-5

Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal
Volume 26, Issue 1 , Pages 39-44 , 2008

Article Tools