Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal
Volume 24, Issue 1 , Pages 8-15, 2006

Mobility Activity of Stroke Patients During Inpatient Rehabilitation

  • Thorlene Egerton, BPhty, MPhil

      Affiliations

    • School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests and correspondence to: Thorlene Egerton, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
    • ,
  • Douglas J. Maxwell, BSc

      Affiliations

    • PAL Technologies, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    • ,
  • Malcolm H. Granat, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, United Kingdom

Received 7 March 2006; accepted 22 September 2006.

Article Outline

Abstract 

The purposes of this study were to quantify the actual upright activity of inpatient stroke patients in order to investigate the influence of disability, physiotherapy contact time, and time since stroke on the amount of activity recorded. Forty-one inpatients from three Glasgow stroke units were monitored during one therapeutic day. Measurements were made using an instrumented recording device which quantified (i) the proportion of time spent upright, and (ii) the frequency of transitions to upright. The results were compared to a global measure of disability, the Barthel Index, a functional mobility scale, the Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI) and walking speed. Results were also compared to time spent in physiotherapy and the time since their stroke. The patients spent an average of 8.3% of the therapeutic day upright. They transitioned to upright an average of 2.6 times/hour. There were significant correlations between upright activity (proportion of time) and Barthel Index score (r = 0.79, p < 0.01), RMI score (r = 0.77, p < 0.01), walking speed (r = 0.48, p = 0.02), and physiotherapy time (r = 0.43, p = 0.01). Physiotherapy contact time was independently related to activity, indicating that physiotherapy directly influences quantity of mobility activity during inpatient rehabilitation. The patients spent a small proportion of the therapeutic day upright despite being in dedicated stroke rehabilitation units, and each patient's activity level was dependent upon both their level of disability and the amount of physiotherapy input they received.

Key words:  activity , mobility , physiotherapy , stroke

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

 

Back to Article Outline

References 

  1. The Glasgow Augmented Physiotherapy Study (GAPS) group  . Can augmented physiotherapy input enhance recovery of mobility after stroke? A randomized controlled trial . Clin Rehabilitation . 2004;18:529–537
  2. Stroke Unit Trialists' Collaboration . Collaborative systematic review of the randomised trials of organised inpatient (stroke unit) care after stroke . BMJ . 1997;314:1151–1159
  3. Stroke Unit Trialists' Collaboration . How do stroke units improve patient outcomes? A collaborative systematic review of the randomised trials . Stroke . 1997;28:2139–2143
  4. Indredavik B , Bakke F , Solberg R , et al.   Benefits of a stroke unit: a randomised controlled trial . Stroke . 1991;22:1026–1031
  5. Langhorne P , Dennis M . Stroke Units: An Evidence Based Approach . London: BMJ Books; 1998;
  6. Langhorne P , Wagenaar R , Partridge C . Physiotherapy after stroke: more is better? . Physiother Res Int . 1996;1:75–88
  7. Bernhardt J , Dewey H , Thrift A , et al.   Inactive and alone: physical activity within the first 14 days of acute stroke unit care . Stroke . 2004;35:1005–1009
  8. Lincoln N , Willis D , Philips SA , et al.   Comparison of rehabilitation practice on hospital wards for stroke patients . Stroke . 1996;27:18–23
  9. Carr J , Shepherd R . The adaptive system: plasticity and recovery . In:  Carr J ,  Shepherd R editor. Neurological Rehabilitation: Optimizing Motor Performance . Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1998;p. 10–12
  10. Collin C , Wade D , Davis S , et al.   The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study . Int Disabil Stud . 1988;10:61–63
  11. Collen F , Wade D , Robb G , et al.   The Rivermead Mobility Index: a further development of the Rivermead Motor Assessment . Int Disabil Stud . 1991;13:50–54
  12. Wade D . Measurement in Neurological Rehabilitation . Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications, Oxford University Press; 1992;
  13. Hodkinson HM . Evaluation of a mental test score for assessment of mental impairment in the elderly . Age Ageing . 1972;1:233–238
  14. Rankin J . Cerebrovascular accidents in patients over the age of 60 . Prog Scottish Med J . 1957;2:200–215
  15. Jun M . An Improved System for Long-term Ambulatory Monitoring of Posture and Mobility Related Daily Physical Activity . Glasgow: University of Strathclyde; 1999; [PhD dissertation]
  16. Barbenel JC, Maxwell DJ. Development of reference loading spectrum. DTI Materials Technology and Standardisation Programme: Advanced Materials 1 – Development of Lifetime Prediction Test Methods for Orthopaedic Implants. 1995.
  17. Forlander D , Bohannon R . Rivermead Mobility Index: a brief review of research to date . Clin Rehabil . 1999;13:97–100
  18. Box GEP , Cox DR . An analysis of transformations (with discussion) . Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B . 1964;26:211–252

PII: S1013-7025(07)70003-9

doi:10.1016/S1013-7025(07)70003-9

Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal
Volume 24, Issue 1 , Pages 8-15, 2006

Article Tools